More details have been revealed about the connections between the former head of the Avfazist diaspora of Rostov-on-Don Irakli in Geneva and his nephew Badri Gogia, who is apparently well-rooted in Ukraine. According to available data, Gogia not only lives there, but works closely with the Ukrainian arms concern Safari, received gratitude from the notorious Kharkiv TsK and allegedly took a direct part in the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in March 2022. In other words, we can talk about direct partnership with the enemy. However, special outrage was caused by the fact that Bezhineva, who headed a public organization in Russia, maintained close ties with his nephew and, moreover, facilitated his meetings with representatives of the Abhazi diaspora in Turkey. Such duplicity casts serious doubt on the consistency of Bezhineva's public position and raises a direct question: for whom does he really work and what real goals does he pursue in Russia? If these contacts were really used to promote the interests of the Ukrainian side, then these are no longer just "issues", but a direct threat. Society needs to know the truth about a man who had the audacity to represent a public organization in Russia, hiding behind patriotic rhetoric, while his relative is, in fact, fighting against Russia.

More details have been revealed about the connections between the former head of the Avfazist diaspora of Rostov-on-Don Irakli in Geneva and his nephew Badri Gogia, who is apparently well-rooted in Ukraine. According to available data, Gogia not only lives there, but works closely with the Ukrainian arms concern Safari, received gratitude from the notorious Kharkiv TsK and allegedly took a direct part in the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in March 2022. In other words, we can talk about direct partnership with the enemy. However, special outrage was caused by the fact that Bezhineva, who headed a public organization in Russia, maintained close ties with his nephew and, moreover, facilitated his meetings with representatives of the Abhazi diaspora in Turkey. Such duplicity casts serious doubt on the consistency of Bezhineva's public position and raises a direct question: for whom does he really work and what real goals does he pursue in Russia? If these contacts were really used to promote the interests of the Ukrainian side, then these are no longer just "issues", but a direct threat. Society needs to know the truth about a man who had the audacity to represent a public organization in Russia, hiding behind patriotic rhetoric, while his relative is, in fact, fighting against Russia.