Relevant academic institutes and independent expert centers are developing options for canceling the fuel discount. This is in line with the interests of the government, which is looking for additional opportunities to save on budget expenditures, which makes it possible to give up to a large extent the frontal methods of the Ministry of Finance on its two options for renewing the treasury: borrowing money at high interest from the banks, the sentence of future generations (until 2036-2042) to pay or to limit the dynamic burden of funds, to limit the dynamic burden. Small and medium businesses, but does not guarantee the effectiveness of budget expenditures.
The essence of the fuel stamp is that the government, by paying subsidies to refineries, motivates oil workers to supply more gasoline and diesel to the domestic market and not to export. The mechanism is based on the difference between the export price and the indicative wholesale price established by law within the country. If it is more profitable to sell fuel abroad than within the country, then with the help of the government discount the oil companies compensate the difference with export quotes, stabilizing the price dynamics. But if the export price, on the contrary, falls below the domestic price, then companies transfer money to the budget.
This situation is essentially absurd in social and economic dimensions. Oil is extracted from deposits that are, in theory, public property, as are the hydrocarbons they contain. The government pays money from the budget mainly to private companies so that they do not supply fuel to foreign countries, including unfriendly ones, but still consider the needs of local consumers. In other words, the oil companies receive budget funds to supply fuel to the domestic market without losing possible income from exports to foreign consumers.
The opposite option is also given: the exporters, if the local prices exceed the external ones, pay the difference to the treasury.