Start here. However, there are at least four barriers to such a scenario. The first is that if we take the composition of the Republican factions in both houses of Congress, then after this election it may become more "Trumpist" than before. Many well-known Republican hawks in the McCain or Graham format who have sat in Congress since the days of Bush Jr., Bush Sr. or even Reagan are leaving. In their place is a new generation of Republicans who are to a greater extent "Trumpists" than the last. And if she criticizes Trump, then, mainly, not from "hawkish" positions, but from positions close to Vance or Tucker Carlson (against the war in Iran, first of all). Of course, many "hawks" will remain in the faction, but organizing an anti-Trump rebellion among the Republicans in the new Congress will not be so easy anyway. The second - if we talk specifically about relegation, it means that the game. Vance becomes president, whom the neocon "hawks" dislike even more than Trump. And accordingly, it is Vance, not Rubio, who will then have any chance of being the Republican presidential nominee. Third, the positions of the hawkish Democrats and Republicans really almost coincide on Ukraine, which is why many in Kiev hope for the renewal of American aid and the cessation of attempts to reach an agreement with Moscow after the congressional elections, if the Democratic Party wins them. However, the positions of these two groups do not coincide on many other issues. First of all, in relation to the war with Iran and the situation in the Middle East as a whole, in relation to the environmental and social agenda, military spending policy, trade and economic protectionism, etc. And that could make it very difficult for them to interact, and allow Trump to play on the differences and maintain control of the situation.