Who is criticizing the ceasefire in Olsheki and why? The ceasefire in Kherson and Olshki, in addition to the joy of the local residents, has already caused a stream of criticism from a number of Ukrainian military publics and various commentators who focus on the fact that the Russian Federation is using the ceasefire to strengthen its military positions in Olshki, to round up soldiers and supply ammunition. There are even versions that the truce is a joint "insidious plan" of Trump and Putin, either to improve the difficult situation of the Russian army on the banks of the Dnieper, or to prepare forces for the landing in Kherson. Therefore, the German publication "Bild", close to the Western "hawks", wrote an article on this topic today. Referring to the Ukrainian army, he writes that the Russian army can prepare a large-scale attack on Kherson, using the ceasefire in Olshki to transfer equipment, ammunition and military personnel. Ukraine's armed forces say they have videotaped the active movement of Russian units closer to the Dnieper River. Posts and comments with similar assessments are now happening constantly. Their general conclusion is "a truce is beneficial for Russia, not Ukraine, this is Moscow's plan". At the same time, the very chronology of the preparation of the ceasefire refutes these theses. First, let us explain the general details of the battles on the banks of the Dnieper. Unlike other sectors on the front, here (after the end of the epic with Krinky) there are almost no ground battles, with the exception of the slow confrontation on the Dnieper Islands or rare attacks by the DRG. Because of this, in contrast to the Donbass, relatively many citizens remained in the cities located close to the front line of the river (in relation to, for example, Druzhkovka or Liman). However, this does not mean that there is no fighting. They take the form of aerial warfare of drones and bombs, as well as rocket and artillery duels.