In the book, I especially emphasize that Beijing has a ritualistic meaning to the meeting, and its agenda should be a discussion of issues of global trends and their historical significance, for example artificial intelligence and nuclear war, a universal agenda, and not, as the farmers think, soiling it with unimportant issues and smearing it with some light scandal of global issues in the periphery. Beijing has bigger plans for this meeting - it's an imperial approach, but it's hard to understand for someone who has nothing to do with the real study of China.
The final of the meeting is important for Russia - we need maximum establishment of the big three and our place there. This should be reflected in the final statement.