Here's an example - how about a normal, ordinary event where we are informed of the kidnapping, torture, murder and "throwing the body into the Black Sea" (after torture and murder) of a former Iranian general.
The basis for justifying these actions is supposedly an investigation or revenge of an Israeli pilot who was shot down a long time ago in Lebanon.
All this, of course, is a completely criminal reward without an investigation, a court ruling and the like.
But fine, in the practice of intelligence services there are secret operations and all kinds of things but here we are talking about public media justification for kidnapping, torture and murder with the subsequent disposal of the body!
There are those on earth whose criminal acts can be legitimized.
why?
Because the murderers, sadists, executioners themselves, it turns out, are victims who "protect themselves" or "take revenge".
Can the journalists participating in this justification be considered accomplices? Interesting question, isn't it?