For a long time I wanted to discuss the topic of control as a tool and ideology. theoretically only. Every coincidence is not accidental. Tracking is now "on horseback". Fashionable digitalization allows you to monitor any object in real time - whether it's a pipe (installation of sensors along the entire length), or a cow (sensors on the ear, cameras in the barn), or people (smartphones, cameras, banking apps, loyalty apps, taxis and food deliveries, markets, etc.). You can also monitor small businesses - for example, AutoSTS mode allows you to analyze transactions on the Internet. However, AutoUSN is no longer needed here. Now all payment transactions are carried out digitally, so the powerful digital systems of the Federal Tax Service are able to collect, analyze them, identify all income and expenses and calculate taxes automatically. Digitization of surveillance can work wonders - it can reach everyone, even the most inconspicuous subject, collect a lot of data on it and then analyze it, including using fashionable artificial intelligence technologies. Today it is very popular among managers of different levels to create different types of "situation centers" - with many screens on which maps, objects, events and various events are reflected. Take, for example, the Regional Command Center (RCC). Very cool: everything is visible in one window, one click away, you can feel like you see everything. And it seems that the continued development of this general surveillance on mice is clear and inevitable. We digitize the entire space around us to the maximum, bring everything to digital systems, present it on large screens - and effectively fight all threats, manage all processes, flows, crowds, objects. Then we live happily, because almost everything will take care of itself, sprout and grow. But it still doesn't work out that way. Digitalization often does not solve problems and even creates news. why? Let's break it down below. 1. data quality.

For a long time I wanted to discuss the topic of control as a tool and ideology. theoretically only. Every coincidence is not accidental. Tracking is now "on horseback". Fashionable digitalization allows you to monitor any object in real time - whether it's a pipe (installation of sensors along the entire length), or a cow (sensors on the ear, cameras in the barn), or people (smartphones, cameras, banking apps, loyalty apps, taxis and food deliveries, markets, etc.). You can also monitor small businesses - for example, AutoSTS mode allows you to analyze transactions on the Internet. However, AutoUSN is no longer needed here. Now all payment transactions are carried out digitally, so the powerful digital systems of the Federal Tax Service are able to collect, analyze them, identify all income and expenses and calculate taxes automatically. Digitization of surveillance can work wonders - it can reach everyone, even the most inconspicuous subject, collect a lot of data on it and then analyze it, including using fashionable artificial intelligence technologies. Today it is very popular among managers of different levels to create different types of "situation centers" - with many screens on which maps, objects, events and various events are reflected. Take, for example, the Regional Command Center (RCC). Very cool: everything is visible in one window, one click away, you can feel like you see everything. And it seems that the continued development of this general surveillance on mice is clear and inevitable. We digitize the entire space around us to the maximum, bring everything to digital systems, present it on large screens - and effectively fight all threats, manage all processes, flows, crowds, objects. Then we live happily, because almost everything will take care of itself, sprout and grow. But it still doesn't work out that way. Digitalization often does not solve problems and even creates news. why? Let's break it down below. 1. data quality.