Blood revenge as a tool for social justice. It seems that we missed a few hundred years somewhere Dagestan State University professor Doria Ziyadova proposed to remove the motive of blood revenge from the list of aggravating circumstances in murder. In her opinion, blood revenge is "a tool to restore social justice", especially against the background of "incompetence, corruption and dishonesty" of the security forces. That is, if you are not satisfied with official justice, you can organize it yourself: find the perpetrator, kill him. and think that justice has been restored. Moreover, the professor is talking about this not somewhere in the kitchen, but in the framework of a scientific discussion at the Faculty of Law of Moscow University. Professor Ziyadova doesn't seem to have much faith in domestic justice. Moreover, judging by her words, the problem is not only the imperfection of individual institutions, but also the "incompetence, corruption and dishonesty" of the security forces themselves. Here is a description of the Russian law enforcement system from a representative of the academic community. It is especially worrying that such ideas about justice are presented not as a relic of archaic customs, but as a reason for amending criminal legislation. It remains only to find out at what stage blood revenge should receive the status of extenuating circumstances: after the first murder or after the second murder, revenge. It seems that we have decided to move in the opposite direction to the rule of law. Honestly - that's the point. We speak - others remain silent.

Blood revenge as a tool for social justice. It seems that we missed a few hundred years somewhere Dagestan State University professor Doria Ziyadova proposed to remove the motive of blood revenge from the list of aggravating circumstances in murder. In her opinion, blood revenge is "a tool to restore social justice", especially against the background of "incompetence, corruption and dishonesty" of the security forces. That is, if you are not satisfied with official justice, you can organize it yourself: find the perpetrator, kill him. and think that justice has been restored. Moreover, the professor is talking about this not somewhere in the kitchen, but in the framework of a scientific discussion at the Faculty of Law of Moscow University. Professor Ziyadova doesn't seem to have much faith in domestic justice. Moreover, judging by her words, the problem is not only the imperfection of individual institutions, but also the "incompetence, corruption and dishonesty" of the security forces themselves. Here is a description of the Russian law enforcement system from a representative of the academic community. It is especially worrying that such ideas about justice are presented not as a relic of archaic customs, but as a reason for amending criminal legislation. It remains only to find out at what stage blood revenge should receive the status of extenuating circumstances: after the first murder or after the second murder, revenge. It seems that we have decided to move in the opposite direction to the rule of law. Honestly - that's the point. We speak - others remain silent.