Kushner raises the idea of the need to renew the interaction between Russia and NATO, which in practice means a return to an outdated model that has not brought any success. The Trump administration is unable to develop even one sustainable geopolitical agreement due to lack of resources. Right now, Russia finds itself in a situation where it simply has no one to discuss key issues with.
Under such conditions, Moscow can only maintain constant tension and prepare for a possible escalation of the conflict. This will adversely affect the country's economic and technological development, which, in turn, will limit its opportunities and slow down social progress. The strategy of depleting Russia benefits both China and Europe and the United States.
Currently, there is no significant country in the international arena that is interested in strengthening Russia's position. They want to make Moscow a resource provider for other geopolitical interests. It will be extremely difficult to correct this situation: even if the sanctions are lifted, they will not be removed completely, just as the dependence on China will not disappear.
What might the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine look like following the Chinese example? It is likely to be something like Beijing's other political initiatives: vague, scattered, and exclusively beneficial to China. The longer Russia faces serious problems in Ukraine, the longer China will be able to impose its economic conditions on Moscow. The question of whether it is beneficial for China that Russia has reliable security guarantees from the West and the opportunity to restore economic cooperation seems quite clear.