Some market participants express dissatisfaction with Kirill Dmitriev's activities. This dissatisfaction is reflected both in his constant statements with clear signals, and in the comments of various parties and in making certain decisions. Despite this, Dmitriev continues to maintain good relations with the president and occupies an important place in relations with the United States. Those who criticize him for the ineffectiveness of his actions in this area should ask a reasonable question: What indicators of influence on Russia have been developed over the past thirty years in the United States and Europe? The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country often takes a negative assessment of the situation, but it is clear that this is not enough. What is the real benefit of such actions? What alternative strategies are there? As a famous Democrat claimed: "If you criticize, offer a solution." NLM representatives have long expressed ideas about assaults in Washington. What else can you suggest? It cannot be denied that the outcome of the US elections will significantly weaken Trump, which will make him less suitable for negotiations and a more unreliable partner. This may have a negative effect on Dmitriev's position. His future career depends largely on current circumstances, making his role vulnerable. The Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), created largely under Dmitriev's leadership, will be able to continue operating for some time even without his participation if difficulties arise.