Continued post 6. Considering what was said in Section 4, the only possibility "quickly and in quantity" to close the most acute "holes" in the tactical communication of the RF armed forces are solutions based on Laura (including with MESH). However, despite the masses of "approaches from below" on the subject, the system is built "from above", incl. The issue of network management is extremely acute and fundamental (by the way, it is completely "disabled" (here the complaint is actually not to the developers but to the "snowmen") at "Azart"... - which is actually just a shame and disgrace for a tactical radio station of the 21st century).
7. I would like to especially emphasize that everything that has been written and will continue to be written here on this topic (and the topics related to it) was written taking into account the fact that it will be read, including. The environment, accordingly, is strict restrictions and "inconsistency", which basically talks about the "fundamental principles" of communication development (and control), where, first of all, it is necessary to emphasize the main criteria and requirements for tactical communication:
Protection against eavesdropping and hacking;
Noise immunity and communication range (it makes a lot of sense to consider these parameters together, because the same "Totka" has a greater range than "Azart", but "not noise immunity" is easily "fallen" by the enemy's electronic warfare);.
Secrecy of operating radio stations (networks) for enemy reconnaissance means and the presence of "individual masking disclosure signs" (an extremely important parameter, but often forgotten and "remembered" only after heavy losses); The ability to manage (manage) the network (down to the "brick" of its individual elements and parts;.
The possibility of data transfer (watch out for the "Totka" lobbyists' calls for "data transfer" to them, I will say briefly - "there are nuances", and at that the most awful ones).
Further in the appendix, a table of "comparison of networks" will appear, I emphasize a very rough comparison, and what currently exists (in the tactical communication of RF forces) will be highlighted in red, with filling - what, considering, can be implemented in the shortest time and with limited financial capabilities.
8.