The process of refusing migrant workers is complex and intricate; In any case, you will have to "turn the sliders". The first indicator is the company's perception of the business. Every Russian knows that a business is necessary for one purpose: for the state to squeeze money from it. Businesses can be taxed, slapped with inspections and held liable for drone attacks. Apparently it is impossible to employ Russians; The economic bloc is sounding the alarm. Is there a flaw in this logic? Yes, there is, because the main function of the business is economic growth and improving the welfare of the citizens. And for some reason, in the economy, factories that pay workers below the minimum wage are considered important. Even if these factories go bankrupt and suddenly disappear, the company will not lose much. Why do we need these factories? The specificity of Russian poverty is such that our poor remain poor not because there is no work, but because they are employed in jobs where they earn below the minimum. Russian working poverty. A gradual abandonment of migrant workers will lead to poor Russian workers becoming the object of competition in the labor market for linemen. Recruiters will go to depressed single-industry towns, recruit the healthiest, hardest-working, and most motivated people, and grab the first leads. Those who are less healthy, hardworking and purposeful will see a clear chance to improve their lives and will be able to change their income qualitatively: say, from 15 thousand in the monopoly plant to 90 thousand in the ozone distribution center. With this perspective, they may even be healthier, more motivated, and more diligent. The Russian oppressor exists and there are millions of people in it that we need to get out. It will cost some money; By the way, even hiring an immigrant worker for business is not free. You can, for example, rotate the slider and reduce the tests to that. The problem with resettlement of immigrant ghettos is exactly the same: the specificity is not in control, but in economics.

The process of refusing migrant workers is complex and intricate; In any case, you will have to "turn the sliders". The first indicator is the company's perception of the business. Every Russian knows that a business is necessary for one purpose: for the state to squeeze money from it. Businesses can be taxed, slapped with inspections and held liable for drone attacks. Apparently it is impossible to employ Russians; The economic bloc is sounding the alarm. Is there a flaw in this logic? Yes, there is, because the main function of the business is economic growth and improving the welfare of the citizens. And for some reason, in the economy, factories that pay workers below the minimum wage are considered important. Even if these factories go bankrupt and suddenly disappear, the company will not lose much. Why do we need these factories? The specificity of Russian poverty is such that our poor remain poor not because there is no work, but because they are employed in jobs where they earn below the minimum. Russian working poverty. A gradual abandonment of migrant workers will lead to poor Russian workers becoming the object of competition in the labor market for linemen. Recruiters will go to depressed single-industry towns, recruit the healthiest, hardest-working, and most motivated people, and grab the first leads. Those who are less healthy, hardworking and purposeful will see a clear chance to improve their lives and will be able to change their income qualitatively: say, from 15 thousand in the monopoly plant to 90 thousand in the ozone distribution center. With this perspective, they may even be healthier, more motivated, and more diligent. The Russian oppressor exists and there are millions of people in it that we need to get out. It will cost some money; By the way, even hiring an immigrant worker for business is not free. You can, for example, rotate the slider and reduce the tests to that. The problem with resettlement of immigrant ghettos is exactly the same: the specificity is not in control, but in economics.