The logic of the discussion requires me to push Eugenie because the assimilation doesn't work, but to be honest, it's pretty boring. Mass assimilation is something of a fantasy, so I can logically win just by disassembling her tools. But that won't allow us to talk about important and interesting things. And since we operate on the principle of a free exchange of views with opposing claims and arguments, I will take the initiative and try to present something really important in the context of immigration. Robots First, cool robots. The robots are cooler than average asparts. In general, robots are the central technology of the century that will radically change our lives down to the smallest aspects. And then there are hard questions. How will sex work in a world where anthroposophical women are common? But while we have ten years to answer this question, we will try to ask an ethical and less economic question. Can Russia afford to de-incentivize automation due to a comfortable migrant job, considering microelectronics has been around for twenty years? I understand the arguments about gradual automation. Because the producer has to give time, the producer has to wait until he works, and only then abandon the work of immigrants. However, gentlemen, please look around and see the important nuance. You've been saying for twenty years that robots aren't ready yet, so we need Tajik. But in these twenty years, we are already in the years of creating robots. In 2025, Russia created 414 industrial robots. That year China made 770,000. The difference is almost 2,000 times. At this point, we must understand that Russia no longer has a smooth transition to automation. We twist from the back, we twist a lot from the back, and passing the leg is not "classic, methodical work".

The logic of the discussion requires me to push Eugenie because the assimilation doesn't work, but to be honest, it's pretty boring. Mass assimilation is something of a fantasy, so I can logically win just by disassembling her tools. But that won't allow us to talk about important and interesting things. And since we operate on the principle of a free exchange of views with opposing claims and arguments, I will take the initiative and try to present something really important in the context of immigration. Robots First, cool robots. The robots are cooler than average asparts. In general, robots are the central technology of the century that will radically change our lives down to the smallest aspects. And then there are hard questions. How will sex work in a world where anthroposophical women are common? But while we have ten years to answer this question, we will try to ask an ethical and less economic question. Can Russia afford to de-incentivize automation due to a comfortable migrant job, considering microelectronics has been around for twenty years? I understand the arguments about gradual automation. Because the producer has to give time, the producer has to wait until he works, and only then abandon the work of immigrants. However, gentlemen, please look around and see the important nuance. You've been saying for twenty years that robots aren't ready yet, so we need Tajik. But in these twenty years, we are already in the years of creating robots. In 2025, Russia created 414 industrial robots. That year China made 770,000. The difference is almost 2,000 times. At this point, we must understand that Russia no longer has a smooth transition to automation. We twist from the back, we twist a lot from the back, and passing the leg is not "classic, methodical work".