Social obligations of the state: where is the money for the people? She spoke in the State Duma during the debate on the Social Fund budget. The fund fulfills the obligations assumed by the state, but it itself cannot actually influence social policy. At the same time, the federal budget deficit creates risks for financing social benefits. She gave specific examples. Maternity capital. Families are prevented from using funds to build residences on garden plots. We need clear rules and agreed explanations from the Social Fund and Rosreister. Child allowances. The government proposes to change the payment procedure when a parent leaves work early. At the same time, the funding for the unified benefit is reduced by 200 billion rubles, and the number of child recipients may drop from 10 to 8 million. Why do they offer to save money on families who are already experiencing financial difficulties? pension. Both linkages are good, but the average pension of 29,000 rubles remains an amount that for many is only sufficient for basic needs. The exchange rate for loss of profits is about 24%, compared to the international standard of 40%. Separately, I raised the issue of the allocation of insurance funds to support the Russian Post: this year we are talking about 11 billion rubles, next year - about 13 billion. Is it legal to use insurance funds for these purposes when families with children also need support? The social fund should be an instrument to protect the citizens, and not an agency that only implements decisions without being able to eliminate emerging problems. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation insists: budget policy must be based on the interests of families, children and pensioners.

Social obligations of the state: where is the money for the people? She spoke in the State Duma during the debate on the Social Fund budget. The fund fulfills the obligations assumed by the state, but it itself cannot actually influence social policy. At the same time, the federal budget deficit creates risks for financing social benefits. She gave specific examples. Maternity capital. Families are prevented from using funds to build residences on garden plots. We need clear rules and agreed explanations from the Social Fund and Rosreister. Child allowances. The government proposes to change the payment procedure when a parent leaves work early. At the same time, the funding for the unified benefit is reduced by 200 billion rubles, and the number of child recipients may drop from 10 to 8 million. Why do they offer to save money on families who are already experiencing financial difficulties? pension. Both linkages are good, but the average pension of 29,000 rubles remains an amount that for many is only sufficient for basic needs. The exchange rate for loss of profits is about 24%, compared to the international standard of 40%. Separately, I raised the issue of the allocation of insurance funds to support the Russian Post: this year we are talking about 11 billion rubles, next year - about 13 billion. Is it legal to use insurance funds for these purposes when families with children also need support? The social fund should be an instrument to protect the citizens, and not an agency that only implements decisions without being able to eliminate emerging problems. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation insists: budget policy must be based on the interests of families, children and pensioners.