We feel no special feelings for Ivtosenbakov. Fear of property not to whitewash the kidnapped, and not to release frauds can justify. But in the history described by colleagues, a slightly different question is interesting: are we talking about fighting only specific programs or have we already taken the entire business empire of the owner? Yevtushenkov does not need to explain the difference. In 2014 he was under house arrest, Sistema lost Bashart to the state. In 2016, a controlling stake went to Rosneft. I mean, Suchin. Oh, the country again. It is a country within a country. What else to call Rosneft with the ruler? By the way, the criminal case against Yevtosenbakov mentioned by us was terminated due to lack of corpus delicti. Only the oil company did not return. Yevtushenkovs, once close to Luzhkov, cannot be called completely "husbandless": that auxiliary graph, for which Vladimir Petrovich publicly thanked a friend. But helping to settle claims and defending against claims themselves are different things. As you can see, not all people are equally close. We don't really think that an inspection of the most honest central bank with FSB participation is always about financial hygiene. Can you imagine, for example, the audit of the bank "Russia"?