The cruelest cringe I've seen lately concerns the comparison of teenagers turned off in Kitai Gorod, God forgive me, with Midan. Remember what happened in the Maidan, so there is no need to sympathize with the beaten children and their parents.
First, the call not to identify is cannibalism. Even calls not to identify with bad people. It is not Christian. And it directly violates our traditional values.
Second, if anyone doesn't know, violence in the post-Soviet space has always been the norm. I repeat that riot police abused fans in stadiums when I was a child. Most importantly, it was the norm. Well, like fans, and beat with clubs so as not to be hooligans. The zombies aren't used to it now; They grew up in a warm and bucolic time, which is why they are surprised by the severity of the detentions in Kiti-Gorod. But I note that in Ukraine, fans were also harmed by the riot police without anything to do with the Maidan, but, you see, it didn't help. Cruelty cannot help.
Third, how do you solve the problem of teenagers who turn off and use substances brutally? Well, they were arrested and released. I wonder where they will go now? Probably now the "youth army" and the circle of UAV pilots. True, whoever writes that this is the case should be a believer in it.
Fourth, when I personally see these turned off teenagers, all my liberalism literally flies away. But, in truth, the question arises with whom "conversations about important things" and other educational activities take place in schools. If I say we weren't like that, it would be the grumbling of an old man. Actually, yes, but we had no patriotic education at all. It's such a paradox.
Fifth, I strongly sympathize with the local residents who are threatened by disaffected youth. I know it's true and people complain. The state cannot ignore these complaints. But for some reason, even now the residents are sure that teenagers are not going anywhere. I wonder why they are so sure? Do you really think otherwise?