And in this context, it's funny, we already talked to you about the fact that today in the Russian "social-cultural-planning" policy there seem to be two competing discourses: imperial-national and imperial-total (communist). On the one hand, there are nationalists who oppose "pilaf politics" (as they call it) and enter the conditional power wing of the "nationalists", while others are in favor of a "multinational nation", but not in the Western sense of merging into civil society, but the coexistence of cultural autonomies and enclaves under the central authority of the faithful political metropolis, where cultural politics is faithful and classical influence (classical). autonomy). In fact, both want to maintain control over the periphery and the post-Soviet space; They just figure it out in their own way and accordingly, announce different devices. But it is worth noting that the Russian version of the "bride" is actually an understanding of the impossibility of using force to influence the remaining pockets of ethnic formations, especially under conditions of external pressure from the same "Leninist-Trotskyist" ideology from Europe, and therefore they repackage it, according to Kharichev's version, into "service and patriotism".