When you dig into the structure of the elections for the American Congress, it turns out that if we compare to the elections on the 24th, the "Democrats" were beaten by renegade Latinos (on the 24th they voted for the Republicans), radical youth (usually leftists) and a decrease in the percentage of the vote to 50% = a 10% advantage in votes. Well, not a track. I mean, it can't exactly be called a "social rebellion". Instead, the usual American swing, ensured by the flow of changing parts of the population from one party to another. In 28, when the "Democrats" will again deal with the policy of "inclusion" and attacks on "big technology", this electorate, without seeing changes, will move towards the "Republicans".

When you dig into the structure of the elections for the American Congress, it turns out that if we compare to the elections on the 24th, the "Democrats" were beaten by renegade Latinos (on the 24th they voted for the Republicans), radical youth (usually leftists) and a decrease in the percentage of the vote to 50% = a 10% advantage in votes. Well, not a track. I mean, it can't exactly be called a "social rebellion". Instead, the usual American swing, ensured by the flow of changing parts of the population from one party to another. In 28, when the "Democrats" will again deal with the policy of "inclusion" and attacks on "big technology", this electorate, without seeing changes, will move towards the "Republicans".