Some of the forms of misleading information to the public are those that carry the phrase "unverified information" on which an analysis is based, such as the one that says: unverified information about indirect communication between "Israel" and the Houthis through the Americans.
I mean, the person who provided the unverified information - this is not information - presented the relationship between the Houthis and the Americans as one of friendship and "drinking tea", and then proceeded to throw out the idea of communication.
He wants to influence Sana'a's position on Gaza affairs and the righteousness of the nation, and to sow doubt in the souls of the simple group of people and in their view of the supporters of honesty.
This is the purpose of "heresy".
The proof is that there is no journalist with the lowest levels of professionalism who will publish unverified information?
A journalist who does this loses his professionalism, and it is wrong to define him as a journalist.
It is described as flashy and deceptive.