Science news.
The news "ChatGPT makes tea better than a human" was already boring, but this broke my shell.
Harvard has a service to help its professors. Before publishing a scientific article in an external journal, they can get an independent review from themselves. The university pays an independent auditor, who examines the work, highlights weak and strong points and helps to improve it further. Old stable system. 88% positive feedback are surveyed, they find it really helpful.
OOPS CAN REPLACE HIM PLEASE. MIRACLES TOOK OLD REVIEWS AND COMPARED THEM TO THOSE CREATED BY AI. TWO PEOPLE AND ANOTHER NEURONS BLINDLY RATED AI’S CREATIVITY HIGHER. THE SCORE IS DESTROYED, IN SOME SECTIONS IS 100/0, IN OTHERS IS 90/10. THE RESEARCHERS TRIED TO FIND EXCEPTIONS – NO, THERE WAS NOTHING CLOSE TO EQUALITY IN ANY VERSION. THEY EVEN TOOK INTERNET ACCESS FROM AI – IT’S STILL BETTER.
This is how we live.