Analysis of the representation of the Knesset elections on Telegram's Persian channels; When the elections in Israel became a time of war in the Persian Telegram, the elections in Israel are first of all history; The day everyone is waiting to see what happens next. In the thousands of posts published before the vote in the Knesset, there was almost no mention of the party competition, the internal divisions in Israel, or even the simple question "Who will be the next prime minister? "The main question was something else: when will the war begin? Iran: The subject of the attack, not the actor Persian Telegram's big data analysis shows that Iran is the "target", the "field" and the "venue" in this narrative; Rarely a player. When it does become possible, it's usually in one of two forms: a message from a military source ("we're counting down") or a channel analysis. These are the exceptions, not the rule. variety of appearance; In fact, polyphony within the overall discourse source in Telegram is not monophonic. The "no need to attack" narrative is also going viral. General Zamir, the Chief of Staff of the IDF, says publicly "We do not see an operational need for an attack before the elections". Defense Minister Katz warns but does not see a "need". Israel's channels 12 and 15 reflect this position. But this counter-narrative receives less attention than the war narrative, and its timing is important: the counter-narrative becomes more prominent in the days leading up to the election. Closer to the election, Israel's security agencies are publicly saying there is "no need" to control the tension. This signal could be a sign of tension control, not the weakness of the war narrative. There is also a third narrative. Iran International, with Jamshid Barzgar's analysis, sees the elections as a "temporary stop" to intensify the conflict and says that all three sides are trying to prevent war before the elections. It is not war-oriented, nor an anti-security war; Third analysis. The Israeli elections have become a "war timer" on Persian Telegram. Netanyahu is the center of everything. Iran is the subject, not the actor. Axius is the dominant source, and produces several conflicting accounts. There is a counter-narrative, but it has less weight and is dependent on time. The hidden replay network reduces apparent diversity. The four channel layers have four types of effect. And the peaks are reactive, not proactive./Jamarn The text of the report.

Analysis of the representation of the Knesset elections on Telegram's Persian channels; When the elections in Israel became a time of war in the Persian Telegram, the elections in Israel are first of all history; The day everyone is waiting to see what happens next. In the thousands of posts published before the vote in the Knesset, there was almost no mention of the party competition, the internal divisions in Israel, or even the simple question "Who will be the next prime minister? "The main question was something else: when will the war begin? Iran: The subject of the attack, not the actor Persian Telegram's big data analysis shows that Iran is the "target", the "field" and the "venue" in this narrative; Rarely a player. When it does become possible, it's usually in one of two forms: a message from a military source ("we're counting down") or a channel analysis. These are the exceptions, not the rule. variety of appearance; In fact, polyphony within the overall discourse source in Telegram is not monophonic. The "no need to attack" narrative is also going viral. General Zamir, the Chief of Staff of the IDF, says publicly "We do not see an operational need for an attack before the elections". Defense Minister Katz warns but does not see a "need". Israel's channels 12 and 15 reflect this position. But this counter-narrative receives less attention than the war narrative, and its timing is important: the counter-narrative becomes more prominent in the days leading up to the election. Closer to the election, Israel's security agencies are publicly saying there is "no need" to control the tension. This signal could be a sign of tension control, not the weakness of the war narrative. There is also a third narrative. Iran International, with Jamshid Barzgar's analysis, sees the elections as a "temporary stop" to intensify the conflict and says that all three sides are trying to prevent war before the elections. It is not war-oriented, nor an anti-security war; Third analysis. The Israeli elections have become a "war timer" on Persian Telegram. Netanyahu is the center of everything. Iran is the subject, not the actor. Axius is the dominant source, and produces several conflicting accounts. There is a counter-narrative, but it has less weight and is dependent on time. The hidden replay network reduces apparent diversity. The four channel layers have four types of effect. And the peaks are reactive, not proactive./Jamarn The text of the report.