Over the past two years, huge protests have swept countries in all four corners of the world. This text focuses on the cases of Nepal, Bangladesh and Serbia.
In these three countries, mobilizations led to the overthrow of governments or presidents, which led to these events being presented as authentic "revolutions". However, these processes that have been romanticized in so many alternative media did not create fundamental changes in the respective political regimes or economic systems. The mobilizations ended in dealing with what existed before, but did not initiate any radical process of change in society.
The decentralization and horizontality that characterized most of these mobilizations, and which are repeatedly praised in radical circles in the West, accompanied by the absence of any political project, allow the elites to reorganize and maintain the mechanisms of exploitation and oppression, maintaining subservience to the Western capitalist and imperial system. But now with a democratic face.
Certainly, we have no sympathy for the ousted leaders - not Sheikh Hasina, who ruled Bangladesh with an iron fist for 15 years and maintained an alliance with the Hindu supremacist movement led by Modi in India, nor Aleksandar Vucic, who is responsible for the close cooperation between Serbia and Israel in various fields, including.
But let's look at some of the results of so-called "revolutions".
In Bangladesh, a year and a half after the uprising that ousted Sheikh Hasina, the new "democratic" government announced that Bangladesh intends to be part of the international stabilization force which, as part of the Piss Board of Directors, has on its list of tasks to disarm the Palestinian resistance in Gaza. The desire to participate in the aforementioned force has been reaffirmed in recent months by Bangladeshi representatives at the United Nations and in meetings with North American diplomats.