negotiations to lift the embargo; A deterrent to a sustainable peace The new movements of the mediators and the messages exchanged between Tehran and Washington raised the possibility of negotiations again; But do these visits indicate that an agreement is getting closer? Javaid Gurbanoglu and Nasser Imani answered this question from two angles in an interview with NurNews: the necessity to achieve real points through diplomacy and avoiding trust in negotiations as a guarantee to prevent war. Gurbanoglu: A change in tactics is not necessarily a change in strategy. Javad Gurbanoglu, former Iranian ambassador to South Africa, believes that the signs of a transition towards negotiations do not necessarily mean a fundamental change in Iran's positions. According to him, the officials' statements still testify to the state's previous positions. Referring to Trump's claim regarding the destruction of Iran's nuclear capabilities, he said that if this claim is substantiated, the continuation of nuclear activity will face limitations. From the point of view of this former diplomat, it is necessary to examine how to use negotiations to obtain concessions in such a situation. Gorbenoglu stated regarding the possibility of accepting the enrichment limit: "What I heard" is that Iran will not accept enrichment above a certain level. He emphasized that if this issue is true, he does not consider it a change of strategy, but a tactical change to gain more points. Restriction against tangible points According to Gurbanoglu, Iran's most important demand should be the complete lifting of sanctions; In such a way that accepting any limitation or nuclear commitment is accompanied by receiving a real and tangible bonus. He saw the nuclear restrictions and the lifting of sanctions as a possible starting point for dialogue and said that if the US concludes that it will not achieve its goals by other means, negotiations could be a more logical option for Washington as well. This expert evaluated Mohsen Razai's latest message in the same context and added that the realization of such a path requires an update of America's policy, especially together with the strategies of Netanyahu and Israel. Gorbenoglu called to take advantage of the opportunity of diplomacy and warned that a response only with sharp and confrontational literature could make the situation more complex.

negotiations to lift the embargo; A deterrent to a sustainable peace The new movements of the mediators and the messages exchanged between Tehran and Washington raised the possibility of negotiations again; But do these visits indicate that an agreement is getting closer? Javaid Gurbanoglu and Nasser Imani answered this question from two angles in an interview with NurNews: the necessity to achieve real points through diplomacy and avoiding trust in negotiations as a guarantee to prevent war. Gurbanoglu: A change in tactics is not necessarily a change in strategy. Javad Gurbanoglu, former Iranian ambassador to South Africa, believes that the signs of a transition towards negotiations do not necessarily mean a fundamental change in Iran's positions. According to him, the officials' statements still testify to the state's previous positions. Referring to Trump's claim regarding the destruction of Iran's nuclear capabilities, he said that if this claim is substantiated, the continuation of nuclear activity will face limitations. From the point of view of this former diplomat, it is necessary to examine how to use negotiations to obtain concessions in such a situation. Gorbenoglu stated regarding the possibility of accepting the enrichment limit: "What I heard" is that Iran will not accept enrichment above a certain level. He emphasized that if this issue is true, he does not consider it a change of strategy, but a tactical change to gain more points. Restriction against tangible points According to Gurbanoglu, Iran's most important demand should be the complete lifting of sanctions; In such a way that accepting any limitation or nuclear commitment is accompanied by receiving a real and tangible bonus. He saw the nuclear restrictions and the lifting of sanctions as a possible starting point for dialogue and said that if the US concludes that it will not achieve its goals by other means, negotiations could be a more logical option for Washington as well. This expert evaluated Mohsen Razai's latest message in the same context and added that the realization of such a path requires an update of America's policy, especially together with the strategies of Netanyahu and Israel. Gorbenoglu called to take advantage of the opportunity of diplomacy and warned that a response only with sharp and confrontational literature could make the situation more complex.