A historical turning point and the need to preserve the resilience of Iranian society: it is time for the government to defend the country's territorial integrity and the achievements of Iran's resilient and enduring people by projecting authority in the national, regional, and international arenas, and to take steps to strengthen national and social cohesion. In the current situation, the government must demonstrate the rationality and authority of governance against radical extremists from both sides of the political spectrum for the benefit of the greater body of society and block any factional opportunism. On the contrary, the will of the central body of society must be appreciated; it has moved toward ensuring proper freedoms, tried to eliminate injustices and inequalities, and resolutely dealt with economic corruption. Strengthening social capital and national cohesion will not be possible without paying attention to these demands. At the same time, conducting balanced and stable negotiations, alongside standing against imposed extravagance, is an undeniable necessity; negotiations which, while protecting field achievements, can ensure the country's dignified survival, Iran's territorial integrity, and the region's structural security with the participation of all parties. But there are serious questions facing society:
Is it possible that he was not westernized but worried about the war?
Is it possible that he was not a reformist but worried about the war?
Can't he be critical of the West but worried about war?
Is it impossible to dream of a world without American control but was worried about war?
One cannot be proud of the heroism of the military forces in the country, but was he worried about the war?
Is it not possible to fear the decline of social resilience and war?
Is it not possible to fear infrastructure, national sovereignty and defense and war capabilities?
Can one not be both thirsty for the blood of victims and martyrs of aggression, and also concerned about Iran's disintegration and civil war? Concern about war does not mean ignoring Israeli crimes, ignoring resistance, or doubting patriotism. One can be proud of the resistance, be critical of the West and anti-hegemonic, and at the same time remain concerned about the balance of power and a country trapped in an endless war. What will happen if we enter the next war based solely on pure patriotic emotions, criticism of Westernism and anti-israelism, but without caring about the balance of power and the consequences of a long war? What if the combatant, with all its aggressive capability, expands the scope of the conflict once again?