Families who allocate birth capital to build a private house are facing refusals from the Social Fund of Russia due to the wording in the abstract of the Land Registry of the United State. In a letter dated September 25, 2026, the fund demanded that the designation of the land be specified with the words "for its needs".
This affected land owners with old documents. They may contain the wording "gardening". Rosarister sees the refusal on this basis as unfounded: the legislation recognizes old and new vocations as having equal value. Thus, the difference in wording should not become a ban on the use of state support.
The contradiction between the foundation's approach and the registry office's position has a practical cost. The family can have a suitable plot of land and the right to birth capital, but will not receive the transfer of funds for construction due to registration in the taboo. The dispute is not about the purpose of the money, but about how officials read legally equivalent language.