What will happen first: the restoration of Sana'a or the liberation of Taiz? Super | Malat Hakhali is a question that positions itself powerfully, and summarizes the analyzes and readings that were forced by the political transformations of the Yemeni scene. The truth confirmed by facts and indicators on the ground is that the reconstruction of Sana'a may happen first. Not because the release of Taiz is impossible, but because it is impossible for Taiz to fall in the first place to get it back. She stood firm and fought in the darkest and most difficult circumstances, even when she was besieged. How can it fall into the hands of the militias today, when it has become, together with Maariv, the lungs of the Republican regime and a symbol of national resistance, and next to it is Darmaut as the strategic depth in the south? The question became - "What will happen before the restoration of Sana'a or the liberation of Taiz?" " "- from a whisper in closed meetings to the most prominent title in the Yemeni consciousness, which is echoed everywhere, including social media platforms. It does not impose itself as a military comparison related to equipment and equipment, but as a complex, political, historical, psychological and cultural question at the same time. Sana'a has already fallen militarily and politically since the militias invaded it, falling closer to occupation than to a political coup. The militias did not enter it as a political party seeking partnership or influence, but as a new Imamate project, which granted itself a divine and sacred right to rule over slaves, and dealt with Yemenis as subjects, not as citizens. Since that dark moment, the residents of Sana'a and Yemen have suffered from poverty and oppression, under the weight of endless levies and systematic oppression at the hands of the supporters of the Imamate who appointed themselves the guardians of the Yemeni people in the present and in the future. Here the sharp contradiction experienced by Sana'a is evident, making it the closest to liberation. On the one hand, military geography, subject to the logic of power, says that large parts of it are under the control of militias, whose slogans fill the streets, and whose barricades spread in every alley. On the other hand, the social geography - which is the most durable and true - says exactly the opposite, as the city rejects the militias that swear allegiance to Tehran's mullahs, seeing them as a foreign body invading its ancient civic and cultural fabric. The silence of the people of Sana'a, which some interpret as surrender, is nothing more than an undeclared internal tension, imposed by the war machine, and the oppressive security and intelligence methods that the militias have planted in every neighborhood and alley.