What the child learns here is not only that the Umayyad state committed abuses or witnessed bloody conflicts; Instead, he is given an image dominated by evil and corruption. In the third lesson, revolutions and the fall of the Umayyad state, Yazid presents that "he was an immoral and immoral person", and that he ruled the nation with injustice and the spread of corruption. On page 19, under the heading "Evaluation of a Lesson", the question is presented: Compare Imam Hussein and Yazid bin Muawiya from three aspects! From Hussain to Zayd and then Al-Hadi Building a historical chain of legality This treatment does not stop with the killing of Hussain or the fall of the Umayyad state. On page eighteen, the book turns to Zayd bin Ali's revolution, presenting it as an extension of resistance to injustice, and then mentions that Hisham bin Abdul Malik's rule was characterized by injustice and corruption. When he comes to the Abbasid state, he does not give it the alternative position that ended the Umayyad rule. Instead, he describes its rulers as nationalistic with "injustice, tyranny and tampering with the nation's money." Thus, the depiction of unjust rule continues throughout the Umayyad and Abbasid states, while figures from the Ahl al-Bayt continue to appear in the position of confronting injustice and establishing justice. Then the sequence comes to the fourth lesson, "The State of Yemen in the Age of the Guide to Truth". The one they describe as the guide of truth is Yahya al-Rasi, who came to Yemen about 1,300 years ago claiming to be a descendant of the Prophet and that he has the right to rule Yemen. He spread the Zaydi doctrine and established what was known as the state of the Devi. Since that date, Yemen has entered into fierce wars due to the claim of the divine right to rule, which is the same claim for which the Houthis started the last wars. On page twenty-one, he defines those who describe him as the guide of truth as one of the descendants of the Prophet and one of the greatest Ahl al-Bayt and leading scholars of the nation, before he presented his state by establishing justice, extinguishing disputes and building a just Islamic state. Thus, the student moves, during four consecutive lessons, from the disputes after the death of the Prophet, to the oppression of Ali, al-Hasan and al-Hussein, then the Zayd revolution, to the state of Hawia in Yemen, which is presented as a model of government based on the Koran and justice. Although the page does not explicitly state that governance is an exclusive hereditary right for a specific descendant, the emphasis of these elements within one narrative opens the door to getting an idea of ​​the relationship between belonging to Ahle al-Bayt and religious and political entitlement.

What the child learns here is not only that the Umayyad state committed abuses or witnessed bloody conflicts; Instead, he is given an image dominated by evil and corruption. In the third lesson, revolutions and the fall of the Umayyad state, Yazid presents that "he was an immoral and immoral person", and that he ruled the nation with injustice and the spread of corruption. On page 19, under the heading "Evaluation of a Lesson", the question is presented: Compare Imam Hussein and Yazid bin Muawiya from three aspects! From Hussain to Zayd and then Al-Hadi Building a historical chain of legality This treatment does not stop with the killing of Hussain or the fall of the Umayyad state. On page eighteen, the book turns to Zayd bin Ali's revolution, presenting it as an extension of resistance to injustice, and then mentions that Hisham bin Abdul Malik's rule was characterized by injustice and corruption. When he comes to the Abbasid state, he does not give it the alternative position that ended the Umayyad rule. Instead, he describes its rulers as nationalistic with "injustice, tyranny and tampering with the nation's money." Thus, the depiction of unjust rule continues throughout the Umayyad and Abbasid states, while figures from the Ahl al-Bayt continue to appear in the position of confronting injustice and establishing justice. Then the sequence comes to the fourth lesson, "The State of Yemen in the Age of the Guide to Truth". The one they describe as the guide of truth is Yahya al-Rasi, who came to Yemen about 1,300 years ago claiming to be a descendant of the Prophet and that he has the right to rule Yemen. He spread the Zaydi doctrine and established what was known as the state of the Devi. Since that date, Yemen has entered into fierce wars due to the claim of the divine right to rule, which is the same claim for which the Houthis started the last wars. On page twenty-one, he defines those who describe him as the guide of truth as one of the descendants of the Prophet and one of the greatest Ahl al-Bayt and leading scholars of the nation, before he presented his state by establishing justice, extinguishing disputes and building a just Islamic state. Thus, the student moves, during four consecutive lessons, from the disputes after the death of the Prophet, to the oppression of Ali, al-Hasan and al-Hussein, then the Zayd revolution, to the state of Hawia in Yemen, which is presented as a model of government based on the Koran and justice. Although the page does not explicitly state that governance is an exclusive hereditary right for a specific descendant, the emphasis of these elements within one narrative opens the door to getting an idea of ​​the relationship between belonging to Ahle al-Bayt and religious and political entitlement.