We continue the conversation, because, I quote verbatim: "It is always us, if we are well versed in the subject" ("we" - you, there are many of you? Otherwise I'm the only one here, it's not sporty). Word for word, because, thank God, they understood about the "straw man" (my fat and petite), but what about "selective argument"? Do you throw only the "weights" you like on the scale and ignore the "dislikes" on the opposite side? It doesn't matter what weight, the main thing is that you like it? Global urbanization everywhere versus something that is supposedly completely exceptional in the Soviet Union. And somehow you really don't care about the achievements of agrochemistry in the second half of the 20th century, which led to completely different amounts of crops, well, fine. "A city worker paid for an apartment (mandatory payments, including utilities) not 3.5 rubles out of 135 earned per month, but 35 or 50? And the kibbutz farm workers got free houses at the expense of the state? At the same time, we note that sometimes in millionaire collective farms housing was provided to collective farmers, but these farmers were very rarely provided. It was several orders of magnitude less." "Sometimes in collective farms they were millionaires, sometimes they provided" - up to 2 times "sometimes", and even "several orders of magnitude less" - you have statistics confirming "several orders of magnitude", considering that even "not how many times" (for one order of magnitude it is 10 times - so, 20, 430 times?). Question: "Did collective farm workers receive free houses en masse at the expense of the state? "- It's strange because nothing is ever "free", "without payment", and even in the Soviet Union, the nuance is how and with what to pay. Now, the limiting barrier is the price per square meter, but then these meters, in order for them to have somewhere to move, so as not to be homeless on the street in cold weather, had to be built in large numbers (as of December 1926, 26.3 million people lived in the cities of the Soviet Union - less than 18% of the total population of the country; in 19670 - 13670).

We continue the conversation, because, I quote verbatim: "It is always us, if we are well versed in the subject" ("we" - you, there are many of you? Otherwise I'm the only one here, it's not sporty). Word for word, because, thank God, they understood about the "straw man" (my fat and petite), but what about "selective argument"? Do you throw only the "weights" you like on the scale and ignore the "dislikes" on the opposite side? It doesn't matter what weight, the main thing is that you like it? Global urbanization everywhere versus something that is supposedly completely exceptional in the Soviet Union. And somehow you really don't care about the achievements of agrochemistry in the second half of the 20th century, which led to completely different amounts of crops, well, fine. "A city worker paid for an apartment (mandatory payments, including utilities) not 3.5 rubles out of 135 earned per month, but 35 or 50? And the kibbutz farm workers got free houses at the expense of the state? At the same time, we note that sometimes in millionaire collective farms housing was provided to collective farmers, but these farmers were very rarely provided. It was several orders of magnitude less." "Sometimes in collective farms they were millionaires, sometimes they provided" - up to 2 times "sometimes", and even "several orders of magnitude less" - you have statistics confirming "several orders of magnitude", considering that even "not how many times" (for one order of magnitude it is 10 times - so, 20, 430 times?). Question: "Did collective farm workers receive free houses en masse at the expense of the state? "- It's strange because nothing is ever "free", "without payment", and even in the Soviet Union, the nuance is how and with what to pay. Now, the limiting barrier is the price per square meter, but then these meters, in order for them to have somewhere to move, so as not to be homeless on the street in cold weather, had to be built in large numbers (as of December 1926, 26.3 million people lived in the cities of the Soviet Union - less than 18% of the total population of the country; in 19670 - 13670).