Mykhailo Tkach said that Kravchenko should not have been released abroad: the DPSU responded to the journalist's version According to the journalist, the former Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko could not leave Ukraine because of the sign of the anti-corruption authorities. Andriy Demchenko, DPSU spokesman, explained the difference, which seems to have been ignored in this story: an order to report a border crossing is not an exit ban. And if the system really has restrictions from the authorities, a person is simply not allowed to pass. Therefore, the version about the "conversation from Kiev", after which Kravchenko was allegedly released, was called incorrectly by DPSU. The lawyer Oleg Shrem also criticized this version. He drew attention to one more contradiction: If NABU and SAP really had a basis to inform Kravchenko of the suspicion, why didn't they do it before the business trip or after his return? Ukraine online.

Mykhailo Tkach said that Kravchenko should not have been released abroad: the DPSU responded to the journalist's version According to the journalist, the former Prosecutor General Ruslan Kravchenko could not leave Ukraine because of the sign of the anti-corruption authorities. Andriy Demchenko, DPSU spokesman, explained the difference, which seems to have been ignored in this story: an order to report a border crossing is not an exit ban. And if the system really has restrictions from the authorities, a person is simply not allowed to pass. Therefore, the version about the "conversation from Kiev", after which Kravchenko was allegedly released, was called incorrectly by DPSU. The lawyer Oleg Shrem also criticized this version. He drew attention to one more contradiction: If NABU and SAP really had a basis to inform Kravchenko of the suspicion, why didn't they do it before the business trip or after his return? Ukraine online.