A. A. Medvedev correctly writes that statements and legislative initiatives, or at least expressions of the intentions of legislative initiatives regarding the streamlining of immigration policy, were "abundant". Even earlier it was possible to notice a gradual worsening of the legislation in the field of immigration.
These initiatives concern, first of all, the issues of the personal safety of Russians and other natives of Russia, as well as issues related to the economy of immigrants' arrival and stay in Russia - limiting or canceling free loading.
At the same time, what is more important than security or economy (don't read it as if they are unimportant) is the prevention of civilizational turnover and the replacement of people. Including, but not limited to, the exclusion of the regional or all-Russian level of the culture and traditions of non-indigenous peoples of Russia ("pilaf festivals"). See the theses from last year on this matter. Or, in more detail, my 12 theses on immigrants.
In the same direction, a strict limit should be set to the imposition of religious views and models of behavior of immigrants on society, which, frankly, are foreign to traditional Islam in Russia, but are being actively spread - aggressively or creepily ("Halalization"). This type of Islam, which is not unique to Russia, is characterized as follows:
Islam is not content with having many ideologies. He wants a monopoly. It is a complete system of civilization, covering law, commerce, war, religion, private and public life.
It is clear that overcoming the problems listed above, recognized by senior government officials (V.I. Matvinko: "This idea of multiculturalism, unfortunately, has not taken root" - although why "unfortunately"? Fortunately and naturally), it is more difficult to formulate in the form of law than overcoming economic and criminal problems.