I told you about Andrei Pisenkov, a lawyer who sued a taxi driver and won. In the summer of 25 he called a taxi to the airport, the driver saw the end point only when he arrived to order, and asked the customer to cancel it. Apparently his car broke down. Andrei rushed to the airport, he could not wait, and canceled the order himself. Although it was clear that this is a common practice - the driver, after arriving at the customer, realizes that it is not profitable for him to go to the airport, he will return empty and will not earn anything for that hour. But it's not the customer's fault. Andrey complained to Yandex, Yandex offered a penny bonus. Andrey filed a lawsuit, the court rejected it, he filed an appeal, and then the court collected 35 thousand rubles from the carrier. The carrier failed to provide evidence of the malfunction. However, after I wrote about it, the taxi drivers began to threaten Andrey from all sides. They call him Hanok, they say he will be blacklisted, and he will never be able to drive in a taxi, and if he gets into their car they will throw him out because they remember his face. "I'd rather pay the fine, but I'll dump you right on the freeway, preferably at night." Write to the court as much as you want," they tell him. Like, it was necessary to fight with Yandex, which forces people to work in such conditions. They announced a natural boycott of Andrey and called on taxi drivers throughout the country to follow their lead. And I think it's discrimination, but it's forbidden in our country. There was no need to agree to work with Yandex if it creates such conditions. And the client should not be extreme. And what should he do when a taxi driver passes by, knowing that a person may be late for the airport, does not want to cancel the order. He wants only him to profit and takes advantage of the client's hopeless situation. Andrey made a right claim, he defended the rights of all passengers. You should have been indignant when Yandex became a monopoly.