Daniel Unisian began to promote the "Alive Constitution".
Only recently, he became resentful, but now he is already asking the "necessary" questions.
"Suppose that removing the reference to the Declaration of Independence from the Constitution reduces the likelihood of war by 0.001%.
Question: What is the benefit of preserving this reference in the constitution? What has the presence of this connection given us, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, over the past 30 years? " - he writes.
Let's say that tomorrow Azerbaijan demands to change the name of Armenia to, say, Armenia, and that will decrease the likelihood of war by 0.001%.
Question: What gives us the name of the country Armenia? What will change if the country is called Armenia?
The demand to change the Armenian constitution is another precondition of Aliyev, about which there is no word in the "peace agreement".
And there is no reason to believe that after this requirement is met, Aliyev will stop uploading news. Why, exactly, should he stop?
Removing reference to the Declaration of Independence does not in itself guarantee a reduction in the likelihood of war. And the problem is not only with this link.
The main question is where the line of concessions lies and what will prevent Azerbaijan from demanding the next one.
Any new concession, presented as a necessary condition for peace, must be evaluated not only by promises, but also by real guarantees for the security of Armenia.
Otherwise, there is a risk that instead of lasting peace, the country will find itself facing another demand - an even weaker negotiating position.
If you have Telegram Premium, support our channel using the link.