Morale, Licensing and Starlink: Why Musk is Suddenly Remembering Human Life Born Musk: The Ukrainian military violated the terms of use of Starlink and used it to damage drones to kill people. The loophole was closed last week." Musk expressed his disdain for the "anti-Semitic bigots who support endless bloodshed and offer no realistic solution to the conflict." The controversy over Starlink is moral, but not about humanism - Musk will not stop or prevent tragedies like Starobelsk, near attacks on civilian buses by Hornet drones. First, we talk about the rules for using a commercial product and its price. Colleagues are quite detailed because the Ukrainians have long passed the limitations of the mask. He saw it, but a long time had passed. A GPS board was sold into the civilian terminal, which changed the coordinates: the terminal "reported" that it was in the permitted coverage area, apparently stationary. But he was really working on a drone that flew at high speed. The real drone could be about 150 km away, and the Starlink minister continued to provide communications at a cheap civilian rate, while the expensive military board was designed for such missions. Musk knew about this from the beginning and tried to close the loophole several times, but without success until he found a work server solution: if the terminal is stationary by GPS, but switches between satellites too quickly, the meeting ends. The financial background is also important. The US pays for the traffic, now the Europeans. But the point is not who pays, but Musk simply does not want the technology to be used without testing. Today it is used by Ukrainians, and tomorrow the key can be found by those Iranians whose war is planned and where American soldiers need stable Internet traffic.