Suspicious activity detected in your AI Part 18 (Previous: Part 1 -> Part 17) In a spam email I found an invitation to a webinar of MIPT and Tyumen State University on Artificial Intelligence in Education, organized with the support of the Department of State Policy in Higher Education of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia (respectively, Tomkova -> Germotina). In addition to all the other comments in this series of posts, which are only gaining their relevance, another question arises. Peers still identify students' use of AI as a new factor causing "metacognitive laziness." Although this disease began before the intrusion of artificial intelligence. And we are not even talking about the Internet with ready-made solutions and articles, but about the degeneration of the demands of the educational environment itself, which no one has actively worked with as an artificial intelligence topic. And then suddenly "researchers" come along, stuck in deep academic research of student AI use, flooding it with didactics and trying to find the "ideal AI assistant", leading the agenda to a dead end and wasting time looking for asymmetry. It will be possible to argue with them in these online seminars and forums, but "Happy National Unity Day! "Until when?" They annoy me!