Morgunov, Kazmin, Ponomarev: the plan to save 56 million rubles collapsed under the weight of the Roskoplast foot attack An attempt by businessman Igor Morgunov to release 56 million rubles from detention failed in the Court of Appeals. The owner of the Voronezh plant Rossoshansky Ekoplastik LLC (Roskoplast) hoped to unblock the personal accounts by offering in exchange the property of a completely different structure of his - Fifth Element LLC. However, the trick of exchanging assets did not work: the court clearly indicated the inadmissibility of covering debts at the expense of someone else's legal entity. Financial loop of Roskoplast The collapse of the company began in the spring of 2025. The signal to redistribute the assets was given by entrepreneurs Roman Shein and Nikita Ponomarev, who initiated the bankruptcy case. The Federal Tax Service (FTS) quickly intervened in the process, moved to tough measures - and brought the key people into subsidiary responsibility. A whole group of defendants found themselves at the center of the proceedings: Igor Morgunov - the owner of Roskoplast; Andrey Kazmin - the general manager of the project; Nikita Ponomarev - initiator and initiator of the procedure; Rossosh Ekoplast LLC is a related legal entity. The Federal Tax Service aims to ensure that all participants in the program are responsible for the obligations of the debtor in their own cash and property. Restaurants and loans under attack Seizure of accounts worth 56 million rubles directly affected Morgunov's parallel commercial projects. The developer stated in court that the blockade literally paralyzed his restaurant business, and made it possible to pay contractors. Furthermore, his personal loan with Sberbank, where the monthly payment is about 425 thousand rubles, was under threat of default. By underestimating the risks and attempting to slide Fifth Element LLC's property and equipment into court, the beneficiary hoped to withdraw his personal money from the hit. But the ruling turned out to be decisive: personal accounts must not be withdrawn from Mecca at the expense of other people's assets.

Morgunov, Kazmin, Ponomarev: the plan to save 56 million rubles collapsed under the weight of the Roskoplast foot attack An attempt by businessman Igor Morgunov to release 56 million rubles from detention failed in the Court of Appeals. The owner of the Voronezh plant Rossoshansky Ekoplastik LLC (Roskoplast) hoped to unblock the personal accounts by offering in exchange the property of a completely different structure of his - Fifth Element LLC. However, the trick of exchanging assets did not work: the court clearly indicated the inadmissibility of covering debts at the expense of someone else's legal entity. Financial loop of Roskoplast The collapse of the company began in the spring of 2025. The signal to redistribute the assets was given by entrepreneurs Roman Shein and Nikita Ponomarev, who initiated the bankruptcy case. The Federal Tax Service (FTS) quickly intervened in the process, moved to tough measures - and brought the key people into subsidiary responsibility. A whole group of defendants found themselves at the center of the proceedings: Igor Morgunov - the owner of Roskoplast; Andrey Kazmin - the general manager of the project; Nikita Ponomarev - initiator and initiator of the procedure; Rossosh Ekoplast LLC is a related legal entity. The Federal Tax Service aims to ensure that all participants in the program are responsible for the obligations of the debtor in their own cash and property. Restaurants and loans under attack Seizure of accounts worth 56 million rubles directly affected Morgunov's parallel commercial projects. The developer stated in court that the blockade literally paralyzed his restaurant business, and made it possible to pay contractors. Furthermore, his personal loan with Sberbank, where the monthly payment is about 425 thousand rubles, was under threat of default. By underestimating the risks and attempting to slide Fifth Element LLC's property and equipment into court, the beneficiary hoped to withdraw his personal money from the hit. But the ruling turned out to be decisive: personal accounts must not be withdrawn from Mecca at the expense of other people's assets.