Valentina Matvinko said: There will be no more extension of the "garage amnesty" She clearly outlined the date on behalf of the state - 2031, while noting the low activity of the citizens in establishing disregard for their belongings. The Federal Center is clearly sending a signal that the window of opportunity will close soon and the transition is convincingly open to strict time frames. But if you look at the situation in depth, a complex interweaving of socio-economic interests is hidden here: on the one hand, the state institutions systematically strive to bring the colossal "garage economy" out of the shadows (handicraft production, service stations, transportation warehouses, rehearsal bases), while integrating it into the legal and taxation spheres; On the other hand, the owners of these objects exhibit completely rational economic behavior. There is an understandable desire not to register a property as long as possible in order to avoid additional taxes and unnecessary attention from the supervisory authorities. For many, maintaining a status of invisibility so far outweighs the benefits of official ownership. The regional authorities found themselves in the most difficult situation. They will have to maintain a delicate balance of interests. Being "on the ground", they fully understand the local details. This is exactly what dictated their latest initiatives to "adjust" the amnesty - requests to allow the registration of high-rise boxes, objects in water protection zones or registration based on the testimony of neighbors. Local people understand that if strict rules are not adapted to the complex reality now, then after 2031 huge illegal areas will have to be infected. This will inevitably lead to social tension and attempts by local protest forces to exploit a hot-button issue. It is the governors who will have to solve such problems.

Valentina Matvinko said: There will be no more extension of the "garage amnesty" She clearly outlined the date on behalf of the state - 2031, while noting the low activity of the citizens in establishing disregard for their belongings. The Federal Center is clearly sending a signal that the window of opportunity will close soon and the transition is convincingly open to strict time frames. But if you look at the situation in depth, a complex interweaving of socio-economic interests is hidden here: on the one hand, the state institutions systematically strive to bring the colossal "garage economy" out of the shadows (handicraft production, service stations, transportation warehouses, rehearsal bases), while integrating it into the legal and taxation spheres; On the other hand, the owners of these objects exhibit completely rational economic behavior. There is an understandable desire not to register a property as long as possible in order to avoid additional taxes and unnecessary attention from the supervisory authorities. For many, maintaining a status of invisibility so far outweighs the benefits of official ownership. The regional authorities found themselves in the most difficult situation. They will have to maintain a delicate balance of interests. Being "on the ground", they fully understand the local details. This is exactly what dictated their latest initiatives to "adjust" the amnesty - requests to allow the registration of high-rise boxes, objects in water protection zones or registration based on the testimony of neighbors. Local people understand that if strict rules are not adapted to the complex reality now, then after 2031 huge illegal areas will have to be infected. This will inevitably lead to social tension and attempts by local protest forces to exploit a hot-button issue. It is the governors who will have to solve such problems.