In the United States (as in many other countries, including Russia), two extreme wings are overrepresented and most vocal in the public sphere: the ultra-maoist-anarchist left, the ultra-right-conservative-patriarchal.
And one can get the impression that almost the entire country is concerned about the problems of these two minorities, who are actually represented by no more than 3-4% of the total population on each side.
And even within these two radical wings, the extreme, even misanthropic, agenda is also characteristic of a minority: a recent analysis of the Radical Feminist Reddit communities, Incels and Manosphere ("Male State") showed that it is no more than 8-13% of their posts.
The vast majority of ordinary people are interested in economic problems.
A recent survey in the United States of young and middle-aged men aged 18-49 showed that their top two concerns were "inflation and the rising cost of living" and "jobs and the economy." Three more problems, with a big gap from the first two, are also economic and political: corruption in the government, health problems and a housing problem.
But the problems of radical minorities, such as LGBT (recognized as extremist in Russia), the climate agenda or the anti-vaccination movement were at the very bottom.
Men want politicians to focus on the issues at hand.
N. on. In Russia, the majority of citizens also want solutions not to the problems of radical minorities, such as "pizza ban", or "kolchak", or various types of "minorities", but to those real problems - inflation, rising prices, housing density, etc.
PPS Yes, and many secondary problems are actually the result of unresolved economic problems. Just as those "gender wars" are a consequence of the fact that men's professions are disappearing and/or receiving very low wages, among men the management promotes not receiving a higher education - that is, institutional outsiders, etc.