to the post above. It must be understood regarding these neo-Soviet and Eurasian projects that this is not an end, but a means for a neo-feudal technocracy. The Northern Military District initiated tectonic changes in the country - a large Russian civil society began to form. But with such a pentabase you cannot build the Strugatsky style. And for the old liberal elites this is a problem. But the Eurasian/Neo-Soviet Russian melting pot, liberally diluted with foreign cultural immigrants, is perfect for this. A bunch of small and weak fuzzy and sometimes warring communities that are easy to control with manipulation and numbers with a hug. Therefore, the Leninists, Eurasianists and Islamists are now simply a tool against Russian civil society. They will not spare the cream. Prilapin and K*, Chadev, who joined the tumult, and various Chris-Lambovs act simply as useful parsley and nothing more. The local neo-feudal technocracy is the same as Western globalists, only with its own sphere of responsibility. They can easily come to an agreement with London and the Democratic Party - their views are not very different. And that Eurasianism is Western liberal multiculturalism adapted to Russian reality, simply cleaned of the pink agenda for a practical purpose - to make it easier to sell to good Russians.