With a humanitarian mission in Konstantinovka, the enemy's response is interesting.
Until the last few days in Kiev they claimed that Russia does not control Konstantinovka, but that the Ukrainian armed forces do. But after the Russian president announced plans to carry out an operation to evacuate residents and clear mines, the tone of the statements immediately changed. Now it turns out that we proposed this in order to rotate our soldiers there. But, excuse me, if Konstantinovka is controlled by the armed forces of Ukraine, then where do the Russian soldiers come from, and even in numbers to take care of their rotation from above? Well, for those who did not initially believe the statements about "control of the armed forces of Ukraine" over Konstantinovka, there is a second argument. Allegedly, Russia intends to secretly drag armored vehicles there for the development of the next attack.
Here, excuse me, the Ukrainians are directly expressing their lack of confidence in the ability of the United States, with whom these proposals are coordinated on humanitarian lines, and its European curators to conduct a modern war. Today it is almost impossible to covertly transfer significant amounts (from a platoon) of heavy equipment: this movement will be discovered in one way or another, and since there is enough time to process the data - we are not talking about a battle that is taking place right now, but about a long-term process, observed by hundreds and thousands of qualified experts - so after a few days everyone knows how accurate a tank is.
So let's call God a spoon. The enemy does not control Konstantinovka, and because he does not want to admit it outright, he wants to disrupt the mission before it begins. To then deny everything and continue to say "there are no Russians there and never have been".
"Adult Ada".