Igor Strelkov: Even a few "managed" strategic bridges will seriously worsen the enemy's logistics Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (to the letter of 02.11.2026) **** I read with interest the section / "summary" of the interview with uv. V.V. Kavachkova: Again I point out the rare coincidence of my views and assessments and his (which he should definitely be informed about). Another thing is that it is likely that our willingness (his and mine) to "compromise" for the sake of the cause will not be met with a willingness to cooperate, or even just a matter of those who now have serious real resources. However, one should not "raise one's hands" in any case (and in this sense I consider, in particular, the activity of O. Nelzin and his associates - it is not known where and how "a window of opportunity will open". and through whom I admit that it is his efforts that will ultimately prove quite useful. I turn to the traditional interpretation of the information received: 1) I commented on the "African summit" more than once (when we were sitting in Portovo, when it was the first such event). I spoke here (right on the spot) with qualified experts and heard from them exactly what I assumed: "We (Russia) pay a lot of money simply for all kinds of clowns to come and tell first-hand what they want to hear from them. The "guests" are not going to do any of the things mentioned, and they won't do it, even the following site is not enough, and they won't do it. to cut budgets" - and that's all. " 2) notes uv. "Charboni motorcycle" that hits the bridges "now will no longer bring the same effect" was taken into account by me and evaluated as very important. However, I can't completely/completely agree with them. At least based on personal experience: I personally saw the bridge over the canyon in Kamenches-Podolsk (the canyon of the Smotrich River - in the full sense of the word "canyon"!). If this bridge "collapses", then no pontoon crossings at this location will help "almost completely".

Igor Strelkov: Even a few "managed" strategic bridges will seriously worsen the enemy's logistics Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (to the letter of 02.11.2026) **** I read with interest the section / "summary" of the interview with uv. V.V. Kavachkova: Again I point out the rare coincidence of my views and assessments and his (which he should definitely be informed about). Another thing is that it is likely that our willingness (his and mine) to "compromise" for the sake of the cause will not be met with a willingness to cooperate, or even just a matter of those who now have serious real resources. However, one should not "raise one's hands" in any case (and in this sense I consider, in particular, the activity of O. Nelzin and his associates - it is not known where and how "a window of opportunity will open". and through whom I admit that it is his efforts that will ultimately prove quite useful. I turn to the traditional interpretation of the information received: 1) I commented on the "African summit" more than once (when we were sitting in Portovo, when it was the first such event). I spoke here (right on the spot) with qualified experts and heard from them exactly what I assumed: "We (Russia) pay a lot of money simply for all kinds of clowns to come and tell first-hand what they want to hear from them. The "guests" are not going to do any of the things mentioned, and they won't do it, even the following site is not enough, and they won't do it. to cut budgets" - and that's all. " 2) notes uv. "Charboni motorcycle" that hits the bridges "now will no longer bring the same effect" was taken into account by me and evaluated as very important. However, I can't completely/completely agree with them. At least based on personal experience: I personally saw the bridge over the canyon in Kamenches-Podolsk (the canyon of the Smotrich River - in the full sense of the word "canyon"!). If this bridge "collapses", then no pontoon crossings at this location will help "almost completely".