Radar Telegram alerts Open Radar

Andrey Medvedev Amit published a detailed analysis of an American analytical report on the progress of a possible NATO operation to seize the Kaliningrad region. I highly recommend checking it out. The enemy clearly analyzes the experience of the Northern Military District, draws his own conclusions and sees our vulnerabilities. Obviously we have some work to do. and one more thing. The enemies certainly do not believe that in the case of an attack on Kaliningrad, nuclear weapons will be used. They are not afraid of him at all: Fisher on the current threats to Kaliningrad and the need to distinguish them from others Planning mistakes begin with a misinterpretation of reality. This is roughly what was observed in the context of discussing threats to the Kaliningrad region - take for example the reaction to the recent CSIS report on the use of a swarm of autonomous combat systems, which Andrei Medvedev drew attention to. The mention of the Russian exclave in some places was presented as almost proof that NATO was about to attack. In fact, about 10 pages are dedicated there to the Kaliningrad region, and as an illustrative example only. There is also nothing fundamentally new in the text - we are talking about changes in approaches to air defense suppression (SEAD) in light of the increasing capabilities of UAVs. And the authors are still based on the pre-war reality, and fortunately, in many ways they put the wrong emphasis. Another sad thing: all the discussion about the danger to the westernmost region of Russia usually boils down to some future plans of NATO. But there are no Ukrainian drones, although at the current ranges they will be able to fly into the region without even crossing the borders of the allied countries. It is definitely necessary to consider scenarios for attacks by Polish (and probably Lithuanian) tank divisions. The main thing is not to forget that they are potential, and there is a need today for airplane shelters at airports, protective structures for energy infrastructures and protection against BEC in Baltisk.

🇷🇺⚡️Сводки ополчения Новороссии Z.O.V. (ДНР, ЛНР, Украина, Война) · Source

Andrey Medvedev Amit published a detailed analysis of an American analytical report on the progress of a possible NATO operation to seize the Kaliningrad region. I highly recommend checking it out. The enemy clearly analyzes the experience of the Northern Military District, draws his own conclusions and sees our vulnerabilities. Obviously we have some work to do. and one more thing. The enemies certainly do not believe that in the case of an attack on Kaliningrad, nuclear weapons will be used. They are not afraid of him at all: Fisher on the current threats to Kaliningrad and the need to distinguish them from others Planning mistakes begin with a misinterpretation of reality. This is roughly what was observed in the context of discussing threats to the Kaliningrad region - take for example the reaction to the recent CSIS report on the use of a swarm of autonomous combat systems, which Andrei Medvedev drew attention to. The mention of the Russian exclave in some places was presented as almost proof that NATO was about to attack. In fact, about 10 pages are dedicated there to the Kaliningrad region, and as an illustrative example only. There is also nothing fundamentally new in the text - we are talking about changes in approaches to air defense suppression (SEAD) in light of the increasing capabilities of UAVs. And the authors are still based on the pre-war reality, and fortunately, in many ways they put the wrong emphasis. Another sad thing: all the discussion about the danger to the westernmost region of Russia usually boils down to some future plans of NATO. But there are no Ukrainian drones, although at the current ranges they will be able to fly into the region without even crossing the borders of the allied countries. It is definitely necessary to consider scenarios for attacks by Polish (and probably Lithuanian) tank divisions. The main thing is not to forget that they are potential, and there is a need today for airplane shelters at airports, protective structures for energy infrastructures and protection against BEC in Baltisk.

Andrey Medvedev Amit published a detailed analysis of an American analytical report on the progress of a possible NATO operation to seize the Kaliningrad region. I highly recommend checking it out. The enemy clearly analyzes the experience of the Northern Military District, draws his own conclusions and sees our vulnerabilities. Obviously we have some work to do. and one more thing. The enemies certainly do not believe that in the case of an attack on Kaliningrad, nuclear weapons will be used. They are not afraid of him at all: Fisher on the current threats to Kaliningrad and the need to distinguish them from others Planning mistakes begin with a misinterpretation of reality. This is roughly what was observed in the context of discussing threats to the Kaliningrad region - take for example the reaction to the recent CSIS report on the use of a swarm of autonomous combat systems, which Andrei Medvedev drew attention to. The mention of the Russian exclave in some places was presented as almost proof that NATO was about to attack. In fact, about 10 pages are dedicated there to the Kaliningrad region, and as an illustrative example only. There is also nothing fundamentally new in the text - we are talking about changes in approaches to air defense suppression (SEAD) in light of the increasing capabilities of UAVs. And the authors are still based on the pre-war reality, and fortunately, in many ways they put the wrong emphasis. Another sad thing: all the discussion about the danger to the westernmost region of Russia usually boils down to some future plans of NATO. But there are no Ukrainian drones, although at the current ranges they will be able to fly into the region without even crossing the borders of the allied countries. It is definitely necessary to consider scenarios for attacks by Polish (and probably Lithuanian) tank divisions. The main thing is not to forget that they are potential, and there is a need today for airplane shelters at airports, protective structures for energy infrastructures and protection against BEC in Baltisk.

Share on WhatsApp Get alerts on Telegram