No Russian male found. What does the SBU statement say about the events in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky? This evening the SBU released an official version of the events at the Azov facility - where people demanded the release of the men there, saying they were being held there by force and beaten. In short, Valentina Molda, who was arrested yesterday and with whom the demonstrations began, according to the SBU, volunteered to help remove the conscripted man from the National Guard facility. Earlier in the trial she said that this was done at the request of a woman who tried to get her husband out of the military unit. He had surgery recently and had health problems. Also, according to Molodya, there was information that people were beaten at a military facility. But let's go back to the SBU statement. It says that Moloda "impersonated a doctor", although according to the SBU she does not work in any medical institution (she herself stated in court that she is a surgeon and owns private clinics). Young was supposed to drive to the facility in an ambulance and pick up the man. That same day she started posting information about this place on social media, which the SBU says sparked the riots. That is, based on this version, Molod did not follow the instructions of Russian intelligence, as spokesmen close to the authorities wrote about it en masse on social networks. The picture is somewhat different: a woman related to medicine decided to help "recapture" a recruit or member of SZCh who had health problems. For this purpose, she also tried to "raise the public" through social networks. But the effect of this turned out to be very strong - dozens of people gathered and began storming the NSU facility. And this only confirms the conclusions Strana already published yesterday. There is so much negativity in society towards the issue of violence against conscripts, that the smallest reason to break out such demonstrations is enough. Moreover, they continue to arise - even though previous actions of this type have been punished by the authorities through criminal cases against activists.

No Russian male found. What does the SBU statement say about the events in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky? This evening the SBU released an official version of the events at the Azov facility - where people demanded the release of the men there, saying they were being held there by force and beaten. In short, Valentina Molda, who was arrested yesterday and with whom the demonstrations began, according to the SBU, volunteered to help remove the conscripted man from the National Guard facility. Earlier in the trial she said that this was done at the request of a woman who tried to get her husband out of the military unit. He had surgery recently and had health problems. Also, according to Molodya, there was information that people were beaten at a military facility. But let's go back to the SBU statement. It says that Moloda "impersonated a doctor", although according to the SBU she does not work in any medical institution (she herself stated in court that she is a surgeon and owns private clinics). Young was supposed to drive to the facility in an ambulance and pick up the man. That same day she started posting information about this place on social media, which the SBU says sparked the riots. That is, based on this version, Molod did not follow the instructions of Russian intelligence, as spokesmen close to the authorities wrote about it en masse on social networks. The picture is somewhat different: a woman related to medicine decided to help "recapture" a recruit or member of SZCh who had health problems. For this purpose, she also tried to "raise the public" through social networks. But the effect of this turned out to be very strong - dozens of people gathered and began storming the NSU facility. And this only confirms the conclusions Strana already published yesterday. There is so much negativity in society towards the issue of violence against conscripts, that the smallest reason to break out such demonstrations is enough. Moreover, they continue to arise - even though previous actions of this type have been punished by the authorities through criminal cases against activists.