Radar Telegram alerts Open Radar

The answer to FIFA Law 11 Article 3 regarding the authenticity of Esteghlal's controversial goal A review of the International Football Association Board (IFAB) Official Regulations shows that Esteghlal's controversial goal was not offside under Law 11 and is correct. According to this rule, receiving the ball directly from a goal kick is not considered an offside throw or a corner kick; Even if the attacker is ahead of the last defender. This exception only applies when the ball reaches the attacker directly without touching another player.

תרגם לעברית

ایسنا ورزشی · · Source

The answer to FIFA Law 11 Article 3 regarding the authenticity of Esteghlal's controversial goal A review of the International Football Association Board (IFAB) Official Regulations shows that Esteghlal's controversial goal was not offside under Law 11 and is correct. According to this rule, receiving the ball directly from a goal kick is not considered an offside throw or a corner kick; Even if the attacker is ahead of the last defender. This exception only applies when the ball reaches the attacker directly without touching another player.

The answer to FIFA Law 11 Article 3 regarding the authenticity of Esteghlal's controversial goal A review of the International Football Association Board (IFAB) Official Regulations shows that Esteghlal's controversial goal was not offside under Law 11 and is correct. According to this rule, receiving the ball directly from a goal kick is not considered an offside throw or a corner kick; Even if the attacker is ahead of the last defender. This exception only applies when the ball reaches the attacker directly without touching another player.

More on Radar

Want to see every report in real time?

Hundreds of sources worldwide, translated into your language, with alerts for what matters to you.

Sign up free
Share on WhatsApp Get alerts on Telegram