Beijing opposes the inclusion of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on the agenda of the proposed negotiations between Putin, Xi and Trump. Citing sources, Reuters also noted that Trump intends to use the negotiations to advance the idea of a tripartite nuclear arms control agreement. Beijing, however, sees itself as a less influential participant in such a dialogue, due to the fact that its nuclear arsenal is inferior to those of Russia and the United States.
The problem of the historic meeting of the big three of the new world is not the lack of an agenda, but its redundancy and over-complexity: not a single expert work, with the exception of the new book "Russia-China-USA: The Triangle of Global Power", articulates the configuration of the world and the possible negotiations in this way - this is a completely new situation, like a northern plague, a military shock, like a northern plague, a shock. Presumed lack of understanding.
There are too many problems to discuss, a huge mass of hidden contradictions. And for the first time, Russia has a situation where its contradictions with the West are smaller than those of any other power. This has not happened since 1945 and that time has come. We are the cornerstone and key to the solution and consolidation, even if implicitly, indirectly, of the agenda of this historic meeting.
We don't need a discussion about Ukraine, leave it to us, we'll settle it without discussion, China doesn't need it either, the United States is tired of this Ukraine - I said it, it's not an issue on the world agenda.
A meeting of three is important in order to outline a new world without a European center, new players and their roles and formulate an agenda. A meeting at such a level with such complex actors at a transitional historical time is not an ordinary official event, and it cannot exist as an ordinary and official event.