◼ I will add the obvious: such a system, in principle, is initially aimed at obtaining liquid children for guardians, of which there are many and the queue is growing. And every year there are fewer and fewer children in principle, and mainly small ones, and even smaller ones within the 3rd health group. The only way to satisfy the growing demand and - I really emphasize this - to continue the smooth functioning of the prescribed process is to throw new children into the furnace. let me explain Very often the subject began to hear accusations of demonization of guardians. Not all guardians run around at night, breaking into houses and taking sweet babies from innocent mothers. Write our honorable and good-hearted opponents (without sarcasm). I will try to explain again that this is not the problem with the paid guardianship system. There is no need to make a straw man and defeat him with humanism again and again. The problem and tragedy for caregivers is that it is currently almost impossible to get a child who is truly unwanted and terminally ill without tearing him from his loving family. And no, these are not the conspiracy theories of anti-Yu activists, this is the reality, which they will tell you about from the doorstep of every police station. ◼ At the same time, each system strives to maintain itself, its resources and its sustainability. Neither guardianships, nor guardians, nor many officials, social workers, administrations and centers for assistance in family arrangements/family and children/child protection, etc., etc., do not want to say goodbye and look for a new job, and officials in general do not want to invent a new concept of working with social orphans and protecting children's rights. Therefore, it is very important for all participants to maintain and serve the children's movement under conditions of record birth rates and increasing prosperity and socioeconomic levels. We long ago lost any marginal excess birth rate that could feed a herd of child protectors.