Here are some extremely talented people who still refer to "analytics" (which does not stand up to any criticism). It is completely ignored that there are difficult children left in orphanages, whose guardians do not demand money from them, often with serious diagnoses. And they are "compared" to healthy and decomposed caregivers. At the same time, half of all children in care are in kinship care. Their guardians are mainly their grandmothers, who have free guardianship and who really invest in their children. And yes, these children really often give good results. And therapists not related to money do not give any positive results en masse! But what they give is up to 70% of returning children to institutions, including teenagers after several years in care, as soon as the child no longer feels comfortable. And it's good if it's just a refusal, and not a mental diagnosis as a parting word. The optimistic scenario of non-proximate guardianship is at age 18 with things to go, and people with disabilities in a mental health institution are perfectly typical stories. There are happy exceptions, but they are very few. And these children (again, with a few exceptions), despite the benefits and quotas for admission, do not enter any universities, and those who do, as a rule, do not stay and drop out immediately. And they don't show any outstanding socialization results. We often work with these children who have already become adults. Their children are the first candidates to renew the siruprom market. And they talk about violence in their guardian families as often as children who have left orphanages talk about violence in institutions. And their level of socialization is exactly the same. without significant success. So successful socialization and success of children under unrelated paid guardianship is another.

Here are some extremely talented people who still refer to "analytics" (which does not stand up to any criticism). It is completely ignored that there are difficult children left in orphanages, whose guardians do not demand money from them, often with serious diagnoses. And they are "compared" to healthy and decomposed caregivers. At the same time, half of all children in care are in kinship care. Their guardians are mainly their grandmothers, who have free guardianship and who really invest in their children. And yes, these children really often give good results. And therapists not related to money do not give any positive results en masse! But what they give is up to 70% of returning children to institutions, including teenagers after several years in care, as soon as the child no longer feels comfortable. And it's good if it's just a refusal, and not a mental diagnosis as a parting word. The optimistic scenario of non-proximate guardianship is at age 18 with things to go, and people with disabilities in a mental health institution are perfectly typical stories. There are happy exceptions, but they are very few. And these children (again, with a few exceptions), despite the benefits and quotas for admission, do not enter any universities, and those who do, as a rule, do not stay and drop out immediately. And they don't show any outstanding socialization results. We often work with these children who have already become adults. Their children are the first candidates to renew the siruprom market. And they talk about violence in their guardian families as often as children who have left orphanages talk about violence in institutions. And their level of socialization is exactly the same. without significant success. So successful socialization and success of children under unrelated paid guardianship is another.