General vs. Deadline.
War as a solution to problems.
While the Israeli opposition is bargaining over the composition of the future government, and the Arab parties are playing pragmatically, they are working. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is busy with more "urgent" matters: a dispute over military action against Iran flared up again among the country's top brass.
According to reports in the Israeli media, Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir considered the actions proposed by the politician to be insufficiently cautious: they risk escalating into a direct confrontation with the Iranians at a time when the US is "supposedly not looking for" another conflict.
No one is ashamed to reveal Netanyahu's personal goals: former Prime Minister Ehud Barak warned that the right-wing coalition could harm Iran in order to disrupt the establishment of a new government. According to Channel 12, the operation was being prepared on the eve of the elections on November 27.
It is significant that the army is once again acting as a brake: Zamir demands additional consultations and written sanction from the political leadership. The General Staff of the IDF, which has been fighting in all directions for three years, is suddenly revealed as the "peacekeeping" force of the state.
Likud supporters are interested in war for a simple reason: this is the only procedure in which the issue of the change of power can be postponed "until better times", as well as change the political landscape against the background of the coalition negotiations. Especially when tensions arose within the opposition.
The main dispute regarding the future of Israel is not only between the Knesset and the opposition, but between politicians who need the conflict as an opportunity to remain in the government office, and the generals, who are supposed to allow its results (not necessarily positive for the Israelis).
"on.
- On the chaos in the Middle East with love.
Support us.