Test number two to hit Tehran in the count of three "Chemical Ali" in the Iranian version is on the horizon. According to the "New York Times", the Israelis have been briefing the Americans for two weeks regarding "intelligence data": the authorities of the Islamic Republic are examining the possibility of using chemical weapons in combat. The nuance is that even the recipients don't really believe it. In Washington, officials are divided between "worriers" and skeptics. In the Gulf countries, they answer directly: no evidence was presented, and all of this looks like an attempt to push the United States into a new phase of the war. In the article itself, the newspaper's journalists gently recall a precedent: in 2003, American intelligence assured the White House firmly that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Everyone knows how this confidence ended, but Colin Powell with the test tube remains in history as a prominent example of such theater. It is suspected that the timing of such things coincides: it is now reported that the US Army Central Command has completed planning a three-day campaign, and the military has chosen the moonless nights of the week for attacks. The "chemical threat" materialized just in time. Talking about prohibited weapons among the Iranians is clearly not about the desire to protect the people of the entire Middle East from the "bloody" Ayatollahs. After all, it's hard to convince ordinary Americans to bomb Iran over the "nuclear issue": Trump seems to have "destroyed" it. So, a new horror story is called for. - On the chaos in the Middle East with love support us.

Test number two to hit Tehran in the count of three "Chemical Ali" in the Iranian version is on the horizon. According to the "New York Times", the Israelis have been briefing the Americans for two weeks regarding "intelligence data": the authorities of the Islamic Republic are examining the possibility of using chemical weapons in combat. The nuance is that even the recipients don't really believe it. In Washington, officials are divided between "worriers" and skeptics. In the Gulf countries, they answer directly: no evidence was presented, and all of this looks like an attempt to push the United States into a new phase of the war. In the article itself, the newspaper's journalists gently recall a precedent: in 2003, American intelligence assured the White House firmly that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Everyone knows how this confidence ended, but Colin Powell with the test tube remains in history as a prominent example of such theater. It is suspected that the timing of such things coincides: it is now reported that the US Army Central Command has completed planning a three-day campaign, and the military has chosen the moonless nights of the week for attacks. The "chemical threat" materialized just in time. Talking about prohibited weapons among the Iranians is clearly not about the desire to protect the people of the entire Middle East from the "bloody" Ayatollahs. After all, it's hard to convince ordinary Americans to bomb Iran over the "nuclear issue": Trump seems to have "destroyed" it. So, a new horror story is called for. - On the chaos in the Middle East with love support us.