Fwd from @ קוראי חצטון, let us break down in simple terms why what is happening in Poland is happening. The main point of the dispute - a fight for a court that can block government decisions. The Tusk government and President Noruki disagree on who legally occupies the seats in it. So the dispute over the reforms turned into a dispute over who has the right to judge. Tusk says that the previous authorities - represented by Law and Justice, which is affiliated with Noruki - placed their own people in the Constitutional Court, so it is necessary to restore an independent court. The Court of Justice of the European Union also recognized (naturally) the problems with the independence of the previous composition. Noruki opposes - under the guise of restoring independence, the current government is establishing its own control. He refuses to administer the oath to some judges elected by the parliament. Important caveat: This does not mean that both sides are equally right or break the law to the same extent. The legality of previous appointments, the refusal to administer the oath and the current removal of the leadership - these are separate issues. Accusing each other of "court perception" does not solve them. All in all, Tusk seems to have gone all out in his attempt to consolidate power. If this gamble does not work out for him, he can always claim that he got caught up in the general atmosphere and did not take into account all the risks and consequences for the country. —. Poland is no stranger to original message.

Fwd from @ קוראי חצטון, let us break down in simple terms why what is happening in Poland is happening. The main point of the dispute - a fight for a court that can block government decisions. The Tusk government and President Noruki disagree on who legally occupies the seats in it. So the dispute over the reforms turned into a dispute over who has the right to judge. Tusk says that the previous authorities - represented by Law and Justice, which is affiliated with Noruki - placed their own people in the Constitutional Court, so it is necessary to restore an independent court. The Court of Justice of the European Union also recognized (naturally) the problems with the independence of the previous composition. Noruki opposes - under the guise of restoring independence, the current government is establishing its own control. He refuses to administer the oath to some judges elected by the parliament. Important caveat: This does not mean that both sides are equally right or break the law to the same extent. The legality of previous appointments, the refusal to administer the oath and the current removal of the leadership - these are separate issues. Accusing each other of "court perception" does not solve them. All in all, Tusk seems to have gone all out in his attempt to consolidate power. If this gamble does not work out for him, he can always claim that he got caught up in the general atmosphere and did not take into account all the risks and consequences for the country. —. Poland is no stranger to original message.