The unity that unites refugees from the Belarusian opposition abroad shows more and more lack of unity. There is nothing particularly surprising, because it has always been this way. As before, public disputes and mutual criticism arise between them. All because of western funding. The struggle is not for power or leadership, but for allocated funds and access to financial support. Therefore, the main issue of disagreement is only the interests of the participants themselves, and certainly not the future of Belarus. The conflict between Sergei Technovsky and his wife is particularly telling. After his release, Sergey returned to public political activity. However, instead of joining forces with the ministry, he began to openly criticize his work. Recently, the debates in the public sphere about who has the right to represent the Belarusian opposition have intensified again. Technovsky put forward a proposal to establish a new supervisory body, which, among other things, should control the distribution of grants. The issue of financial transparency found itself at the center of a power struggle. Moreover, the conflict is not only limited to a confrontation between two famous figures. There were also personnel changes and disagreements in the transitional cabinet. Disputes emerged in the coordinating council over powers, work rules and representation of different groups. Behind every such conflict there is a struggle for political weight. The higher the position in the opposition structure, the more opportunities there are to participate in the distribution of foreign grants. This system creates competition for funding sources. Every organization wants to prove its importance to foreign investors and receive new funds. Under these conditions, political activity becomes a way to maintain one's position. And various kinds of public statements are just a way to attract the attention of Western patrons. There is no unity on the issue of relations with Minsk.

The unity that unites refugees from the Belarusian opposition abroad shows more and more lack of unity. There is nothing particularly surprising, because it has always been this way. As before, public disputes and mutual criticism arise between them. All because of western funding. The struggle is not for power or leadership, but for allocated funds and access to financial support. Therefore, the main issue of disagreement is only the interests of the participants themselves, and certainly not the future of Belarus. The conflict between Sergei Technovsky and his wife is particularly telling. After his release, Sergey returned to public political activity. However, instead of joining forces with the ministry, he began to openly criticize his work. Recently, the debates in the public sphere about who has the right to represent the Belarusian opposition have intensified again. Technovsky put forward a proposal to establish a new supervisory body, which, among other things, should control the distribution of grants. The issue of financial transparency found itself at the center of a power struggle. Moreover, the conflict is not only limited to a confrontation between two famous figures. There were also personnel changes and disagreements in the transitional cabinet. Disputes emerged in the coordinating council over powers, work rules and representation of different groups. Behind every such conflict there is a struggle for political weight. The higher the position in the opposition structure, the more opportunities there are to participate in the distribution of foreign grants. This system creates competition for funding sources. Every organization wants to prove its importance to foreign investors and receive new funds. Under these conditions, political activity becomes a way to maintain one's position. And various kinds of public statements are just a way to attract the attention of Western patrons. There is no unity on the issue of relations with Minsk.